Everything Everything – Man Alive

By ,

If you believe what you read in the press, Everything Everything are a band destined for stardom, and well on their way up the ranks of the indie elite. They began their career in 2008 with the release of single ‘Suffragette Suffragette’, before cementing their existence with being shortlisted on the BBC’s Sound of 2010 award. Unfortunately, their hype will only lead to sore disappointment as debut Man Alive hardly raises the roof.

It should come as no surprise that the Manchester/Newcastle based band offer the same lilted delivery that propelled Futureheads’ self-titled to fame in 2004. However, there’s an unexpected element of pop, akin to Black Kids’ 2008 debut Partie Traumatic. This very nearly manages to compensate for frontman Jonathan’s chords, which at times offer a dog-whistle tone, piercing enough to shatter the most sturdy of ear drums. Nearly, but not quite.

Although opening track ‘My KZ Ur BF’ has a promising start, the verse that kicks in is weak, and the song soon erupts into an uncontrollable mass of askew limbs and spat lyrics. In stark contrast, the chorus and bridge are strong pieces of dance-floor gold. This contradiction echoes throughout the majority of Man Alive: following track ‘Qwerty Finger’ is an odd mixture of commercially acceptable instrumentation, and unconventional vocal operatic, bettered in the past by Animal Collective and Safetyword. It’s hard to grasp the concept behind the sound – as though the band are mid-charge on the mainstream charts, but have failed to leave behind the innovative creation that once inspired them.

Not to discredit their attempt in one fell swoop, moments of genius occasional swell through the mess: ‘Final Form’ follows a similar direction, but retains its structure enough for the subtle yet persistent guitar to make an impact for the first time. Elsewhere, ‘Leave the Engine Room’ examines Everything Everything’s potential in the stripped down electro arena. On paper, ‘Photoshop Handsome’ is a moment for celebration, but on record it’s marred by the frustratingly hysterical vocals. They’re the only aspect of the music hauling the band away from the line marked ‘acceptable and fun pop’.

After half an hour of medium to high-pitched warbling, Man Alive becomes tiresome and you wonder whether the tactic is the only trick the foursome has up their sleeves. The real crime is that if they didn’t resort to constantly using such a shriek, the album would be a decent and complete pop record, the like of which haven’t been seen since the heady days of 2003. As it is, if you manage to sit through the whole thing without squirming once, all credit to you.

48 Responses to Everything Everything – Man Alive

  1. Saxon August 24, 2010 at 11:39 am #

    shit review. album is great

  2. Jimmmiii August 24, 2010 at 12:54 pm #

    seconded

  3. Jonno James August 24, 2010 at 2:49 pm #

    Can we give Ripfork the chance to critique this sentence:

    “an odd mixture of commercially acceptable instrumentation, and unconventional vocal operatic, bettered in the past by Animal Collective and Safetyword”

    It’s not a bad review but it’s a mistake that Tiffany reviewed this record when she obviously doesn’t like the band’s sound. It’s like somebody reviewing a rap record and saying “It’s not singing, it’s just talking etc”…

    Ha.

  4. Davidrichard01 August 24, 2010 at 3:24 pm #

    It is a poor review – Michael (drummer) isn’t the front man – Jonathan is. At least get the facts straight!

    In addition: ‘It’s hard to grasp the concept behind the sound – as though the band are mid-charge on the mainstream charts, but have failed to leave behind the innovative creation that once inspired them.’

    Why on earth would they leave behind the ‘innovative creation’ that inspired them? That is what makes this band different to every other. They are not just ‘another band’ and that is precisely what makes them so exciting.

  5. Rickles200 August 24, 2010 at 3:42 pm #

    Sack the writer.

  6. jimmmiii August 24, 2010 at 5:00 pm #

    slack journalism – probably distracted by x factor

  7. ChipChap August 24, 2010 at 7:40 pm #

    Tiffany, you’re fat.

  8. Ryan August 25, 2010 at 8:17 am #

    Oh come on, this band are shit.

  9. phoebe August 25, 2010 at 11:53 am #

    Tiffany, the phrase is “one fell swoop”, not “one foul swoop”. Are you really qualified to write about other people’s lyrics? I think not.

  10. phoebe August 25, 2010 at 11:54 am #

    And the track is called “Qwerty Finger”, not “Qerty Fingers”. Nothing you say can be taken seriously.

  11. JonathanEverything August 25, 2010 at 1:05 pm #

    Jesus christ, there are so many errors in this review. Can I suggest you just remove it from the site and get someone who actually knows how to:

    a) spell
    b) fact check
    c) write about music

    to do it again?

    We don’t care if someone likes it or doesn’t. We do care that our name is taken in
    vain by an illiterate.

    Thank you and goodbye.

  12. Tiffany Daniels August 25, 2010 at 7:50 pm #

    I appreciate you pointing out the mistakes Phoebe, but I’ve not mentioned their lyrics, so I don’t understand what you mean by that or why two mistakes make my opinion irrelevant.

    Jonathan – where are the spelling mistakes, and what makes you think I can’t write about music simply because I don’t like YOUR band? Above all, if you think this is illiterate, you should check through your own press release and MySpace. I know you’ll find twice as many mistakes there, because that’s exactly where I’ve derived all of my (lack of) information from.

    ChipChap – way to lower the tone with a really thoughtful retort – because only the pretty people can write about music, can’t they?

  13. Jonny Silcock August 26, 2010 at 8:54 am #

    I’m pretty certain a hop, skip and a jump onto their MySpace page suggests they’re Manchester-based, rather than Newcastle, too.

    Oh dear.

  14. Anonymous August 26, 2010 at 11:09 am #

    “We do care that our name is taken in vain by an illiterate.” I’d hardly call Tiffany illiterate, and I’d argue that she isn’t taking anything in vain.

    So, this is a band that complains about even getting a review.

    Of all the hundreds of records writers get the opportunity to review, an artist should be pleased that somebody somewhere decided that they wanted to listen to and review yours out of all the mountains of music that is released.

    Your reaction is pure ingratitude.

    Also, Christ has a capital ‘C’.

  15. Laura August 26, 2010 at 11:42 am #

    It’s not ingratitude at all. I totally agree with Jonathan – if this were a well-written review, there would be no problem, whether it equated to 0/10 or 10/10. As it stands, it’s clunky, factually incorrect throughout, and written by someone who clearly wants to be the naysayer when it comes to this album. The only thing this review conveys is the writer’s agenda.

    Obviously Tiffany isn’t illiterate. Although this is a terribly written review, the fault really lies with the editors for allowing it to run, for not subbing it, for not finding a writer better suited to describe this kind of music. Disappointing move, TLOBF.

  16. Phoebe August 26, 2010 at 12:21 pm #

    Tiffany you are beginning to look seriously out of touch now loads of other reviews are out: everyone else loves this band, for all sorts of different reasons, and recognises their extraordinary range. You must be feeling pretty silly by now, having no ear for music and no aptitude for writing about it.

  17. Tiffany Daniels August 26, 2010 at 12:42 pm #

    Oh God yes, how dreadful I feel for not conforming to popular view. Get real, for crying out loud, that’s the most ridiculous comment yet.

  18. James Burgessallen August 26, 2010 at 2:34 pm #

    Entitled to you opinion yes. You can disagree with someone. But many of your facts about the band are unfounded which points to either Tiffany being quite stupid, or TIffany being very lazy. Either of which points to bad journalism.

  19. Tiffany Daniels August 26, 2010 at 3:11 pm #

    Besides a missed ‘w’ in a song title and calling Jonathan Michael – both of which I admit were bad journalism, but equally should have been corrected by the editor – what exactly are these “unfounded facts” you’re talking about? Why does not knowing this band inside out potentially make me “quite stupid”? What about this review justifies readers (and band members) calling me “illiterate” and “unable to write about music”?

    It seems to me that many of the people commenting here think Everything Everything have some kind of divine right to praise – because no matter how many times it’s said “we would accept a bad review if ____”, you’re always going to come up with a “but” and basically sign me off as a “fat” retard.

    I sympathise with fans – I’ve noticed mistakes on the internet before, and I’ve pointed them out, but I’ve never attacked a reviewer for their inadequacy because of that alone (in fact, I’ve never been rude enough to attack in the comments either – I’ve emailed the editor or left the piece to its own devices). The truth of the matter is, you don’t like this review because it doesn’t say what you believe.

  20. Jonathan. August 26, 2010 at 6:45 pm #

    I am actually the genuine Jonathan from the band not whoever took my name above – I am not commenting on this review.

  21. Jonathan. August 26, 2010 at 6:52 pm #

    Hello this is the real Jonathan from the band – some idiot has taken my name.

  22. Jonathan. August 26, 2010 at 6:54 pm #

    Use your own name if you want to air your opinions please.

  23. phoebe August 26, 2010 at 8:20 pm #

    Tireseome for you, Tiffany – the facts getting in the way of your opinions: you have still got the title of Qwerty Finger wrong, even though you have tried to correct it. Or is that the editor’s fault too? Third time lucky?

  24. Munchausen August 26, 2010 at 8:27 pm #

    She’s made a few mistakes in her article and that means she deserves to be called fat and stupid? You’ve criticised her journalistic skills because you’re offended she doesn’t share the same opinion about Everything Everything. This hasn’t got a thing to do with journalism.
    Phoebe saying that this band has had amazing reviews making her point that therefore Tiffany’s opinion should conform is exactly what’s wrong with so many so called music lovers. Instead of liking what you like you’re led by popular opinion as usual. It’s pathetic. You morons need to get your head out of the NME and try listening and forming you own opinions of records instead relying on reviews to seem cool and current to your peers.
    Tiffany’s absolutely right to say that the mistakes should have been caught by her editor, so if you’re genuinely that outrage about a spelling mistake and few incorrect facts then take it up with the him (Richard Hughes) but I suspect the reason for the professional and personal attacks on this journalist is due oversensitivity about a band who aren’t perfect or exempt from criticism.

  25. Munchausen August 26, 2010 at 9:53 pm #

    Phoebe’s a turd

  26. Tiffany Daniels August 26, 2010 at 10:25 pm #

    Okay, reason has failed. I’m just going to play you at your own spiteful little game:

    Tireseome? What’s that?

  27. Falalalala August 26, 2010 at 11:26 pm #

    The Drowned Line of Fit Sound.

  28. Anton-93 August 27, 2010 at 8:49 am #

    Some of these comments are reminiscent of the moronic statements you’d find under a youtube video.
    ‘ Tiffany you’re fat’
    Last time I check personal appearance didn’t have a detrimental nor positive effect on journalistic skills.

    Granted mistakes have been made, but it’s pretty obvious that isn’t what people like Phoebe are complaining about, it’s the fact that Tiffany has a brain and can form her own opinions on the band, that seems to be the real problem here.

    One of the great things about Journalism, is the fact that it’s a great way of expressing your opinions/views on whatever it may be your talking about, and the fact that Tiffany is practically being heckled for expressing her opinion, is just pretty sad.

  29. Anonymous August 27, 2010 at 10:09 am #

    Hi Jonathan. Obviously, I retract my earlier comment.

  30. Richard Thane August 27, 2010 at 11:42 am #

    Any factual errors and/or typos in this review are down to Tiffany and the particular editor who subbed and scheduled this review for publishing (Rich Hughes).

    Perhaps it shouldn’t have gone live in its current state – fair enough – but we all make mistakes and it’s hardly a valid reason to personally attack people.

    I will not stand for abuse on this site in any way, shape or form. If you want to cat call and personally attack/ insult my staffers I suggest you do it elsewhere.

    This thread should be used to discuss Tiffany’s opinion of the album – whether you agree with her, or not.

    Any editorial errors – factual or otherwise have been (or will be) cleared up.

    Please take your spitefulness elsewhere.

    Thanks.

  31. Adam Nelson August 27, 2010 at 7:31 pm #

    Not going to make any comment on the article Tiffany, but given that the Riches Hughes and Thane are two guys who work full-time and run this site basically by themselves, I find it a bit mean-spirited of you to claim that “the editor” should have weeded out your mistakes. Whatever people might claim about this site, it ISN’T Pitchfork or even Drowned In Sound, and doesn’t have anything like the resources those sites are able to call upon. We writers have to take the increased responsibility for making sure our work is in a publishable state. To fall back and blame Hughes for your laziness and bad journalism is fairly despicable behaviour, regardless of what anyone thinks of your opinion.

  32. Rich Hughes August 28, 2010 at 4:49 pm #

    I shall take some of the blame for this (thanks for stick up for me though Adam). It was the last one I went through prior to going on holiday, so I should know well enough never to rush things. Let this be my lesson.

    However, that is NO excuse for personal attacks.

  33. Tiffany Daniels August 28, 2010 at 6:56 pm #

    Adam – I didn’t mean to solely blame Rich, I thought that was obvious, but if it isn’t then I apologise and admit that I should have picked up on the mistakes too. Although, it does bare mentioning that I have a full time job, contribute to two other publications and edit my own zine as well…it’s not like TLOBF occupies 100% of my time and attention.

    Anyway, I’m sorry that I offended so many people by not checking my facts. I’m sorry I have continued to offend people by insinuating Rich could have picked up on the mistakes.

  34. dee August 29, 2010 at 8:29 pm #

    I quite liked the album.

  35. danny wadeson August 30, 2010 at 1:40 pm #

    On the one hand it’s best to just let this comment thread die, but on the other hand I want to chime in as a fellow TLOBF writer.

    Firstly, we all make typos/mistakes, as writers and/or editors. I once saw an issue of Empire that had duplicated the entirety of the first half of the magazine. THAT’S a fuck up. A few typos and factual mistakes aren’t ideal but that’s what constructive criticism is for.

    Secondly, an album review is an opinion piece, not an aggregate of a bunch of solely positive reviews from other websites. If you like the album; great! If you disagree with Tiff’s opinion; great! That means we don’t live in an Orwellian nightmare!

    Also, I really hope Tiffany takes some positives from this because I’d hate for a bunch of trolls and bigots who think that the anonymity of the internet means they can shit all over someone’s self esteem (not that I’m implying Tiffany necessarily gives two shits about being called fat by someone who has never even met her) to hurt her confidence.

    Lastly, I do actually really like this album but I can totally see how it could grate on your nerves. Tiffany, what the hell were you thinking!?

  36. soup August 31, 2010 at 12:49 pm #

    Props to Tiffany for trolling the shit out of a bunch of butthurt hipsters! :D

  37. Rich Hughes August 31, 2010 at 12:52 pm #

    I like the artwork.

  38. Reading Goer August 31, 2010 at 1:00 pm #

    Must say, saw them at reading, and was very impressed both with their stage set and their surprise performance on the Introducing stage. Definately buying their album later today. Both were incredible performances of fantastic uplifting songs.

  39. Tom Jenkinson August 31, 2010 at 2:29 pm #

    This comment thread is like a who’s who of Line of Best Fit writers! You can find typos in magazines and books. For errors why not google what The Independent thought the Big Chill festival was originally called…

    I enjoyed reading the review probably more than I have the other ‘I <3 EE’ on offer. I am a massive fan and have interviewed them for my site. The different approach surely lets you think about all the bands apparent talent.

    At least she didn’t mention their ‘video game’ or ‘sega’ sound they sometimes incorporate. Christ, pretty sure after 50 or so interviews that base has been covered.

    Good interview, gotta love trollin’ comments though. Especially ones that grab so many peoples attention!

  40. Masterdog75 August 31, 2010 at 5:23 pm #

    Frankly it’s not the review that puts me off, it’s that chuffing advert…and it’s not just this site….it’s everywhere (everywhere). Annoying beyond belief…
    As for the mistakes, meh, errors happen. As long as the opinion shines through, who cares?

  41. rich August 31, 2010 at 6:36 pm #

    I can see Tiffany’s point about the vocal style. It’s certainly distinctive and could irritate someone in the same way that matt bellamy’s over-enthusiastic intakes of breath cause me to claw out my own limbs. Doesn’t mean it’s universally a bad thing, just rubs some people up the wrong way. I also agree that some elements are also a bit overused. The stabs of harmony could definately start to grate if they’re everywhere in the followup, but I guess nobody ever shouted at the Beach Boys.
    Personally I think it’s a great debut. Photoshop handsome was the only track I thought was actually weak. Final form, although lovely, sounds a bit like it could have been lifted from Radiohead’s back catalogue, and a couple of others were bordering on inoffensive rather then grabbing me.

    Sounds gorgeous too, wish more bands still used proper studios, although perhaps not ones with an availible harpsichord.

  42. Paul September 1, 2010 at 7:34 am #

    What are we now talking about? Tiffany’s review? The album? Where the blame lies? I like the record a lot. What I don’t like is the agressive digital marketing strategy that clear shows Geffen are pushing these boys way beyond their reach or ability – and, indeed, probably into a situation where the album sells way less than they’d hoped and they’re dropped within six months. Which is a shame.

    I think they’re doing a really interesting take on pop music, mixing it up a lot with some unusual influences and really pushing the envelope for what commercial radio friendly music could be. I don’t think they’ll succeed, sadly – there’s too much going on to make it palatable to the broadest of audiences.

  43. Shrew972 September 4, 2010 at 8:52 am #

    best new band by a million miles

  44. B. Hart September 6, 2010 at 4:10 pm #

    this stream of comments was easily one of the most entertaining things i’ve read in a while. the structure of this entire system came crumbling down under the feeble posts of a few trolls. this is the internet, things like that happen here all of the time. once you acknowledge their comments have gotten to you, they’ll latch on and go nuts. frankly, it’s hilarious.

    internet trolls: 1
    everyone who works for the site that commented here: 0

    now that that’s out of the way, i found the mixing of the album a little disappointing. the singles sounded so much more gritty and soulful the album release. but i thoroughly enjoyed the music.

  45. Ebzen September 8, 2010 at 7:48 pm #

    This album is great ! I hear some YES influences. The review.. it is a bad review I think.

  46. Lynne September 13, 2010 at 4:25 pm #

    I just love it. Am off to see them live next month. Something different from usual mainstream stuff hanging around.

  47. RaraSpark October 1, 2010 at 9:48 pm #

    I’m all confused…If this is in fact the REAL Jonathan from EE, then technically I am replying to a post from musical royalty :o) I think EE are amazing and so unique, I’ve followed you guys for years and so glad you’re getting the recognition you deserve!

  48. Marco56 December 18, 2010 at 3:13 pm #

    Basically your taste is rubbish in my opinion. These guys take up from Joy Division Smith etc – not because they sound like them – they are originals with potential world class talent.
    Does anyone get a bit of Steely Dan coming thru?