St. Vincent – Actor

By ,

st-vincent-actor-album-art

“Alas! When passion is both meek and wild!” John Keats once wrote. It’s the epigraph that Richard Yates, that great chronicler of the darker side of the American suburban dream, used to introduce Revolutionary Road, and it’s no less befitting an overture for St. Vincent‘s second record, Actor. For all Annie Clark’s doe-eyed physical delicacy and gentle vocals, there’s a fiercely shredded guitar riff and distorted beat that heads straight to the jugular, uprooting the white picket fences of the domesticity where she lays her less than rosy scene. Conceived by watching films such as The Wizard of Oz and Disney’s Sleeping Beauty on mute and reimagining their soundtracks, the follow up to 2007′s Marry Me eloquently negotiates the narrative arc of a relationship in freefall to the tune of a glorious orchestra redolent of Paul J. Smith’s work on Snow White and the Seven Dwarves.

But despite all of Annie’s humbleness, and self-dismissing as “a wife in watercolours” easily washed away on ‘Save Me From What I Want’, this is a record in full Technicolor that demands your attention; it’s impossible to work to, to ignore it when you’re in the room together, and blasphemously futile to try and use as background ambience, taking you back to what seem like ancient times where a whole afternoon could be passed just laying on your bed, wallowing in a record. Every second of music and quirk of vocal tone implies a nuance that goes beyond what’s being said, whether the acute kindly reprimand of a former lover, again on ‘Save Me…’, whose fuzzy percussion skips like Dick Van Dyke as she sings, “Honey what reveals you / Is what you try to hide away”, or during ‘The Party’, soul destroying with its soaring “oohing” chorus, where she exposes the rigmarole at the heart of social engagement that April and Frank Wheeler no doubt knew well – “Oh that’s the trouble / With ticking and talking”.

Whilst the lyrics to Actor remain often sombre, its chamber pop sensibilities mixed with King Crimson style guitar gravel bring it firmly into the realms of euphoria. ‘Laughing With a Mouth of Blood” is mindblowingly sexy (though it feels crass to call it so), as what sounds like whale magic chimes into the lines “Just like an amnesiac / Trying to get my senses back” melting from her lips over a grimy drum beat, before singing, “Laughing with a mouth of blood / From a little spill I took”. When was the last time you heard someone take a “spill” in a pop song?! The charm offensive continues with single ‘Actor Out of Work’, where she takes control, belittling whoever’s wronged her with saccharine vehemence, a contrapuntal mix of her sweet aria and stinging guitars that act as the choric illumination for ‘Marrow’ – if when December comes there’s been a better riff, I’ll eat my proverbial hat, shorts and ears. In fact, I can hardly bring my fingers to the keyboard to write about just how good it is – they’re too busy dancing to this ecstatic mix of load, shoot and fire dirtiness, all razor sharp filthy guitar and melodica exuberance atop oscillating shimmer. Kanye West is going to be all over it.

It really wouldn’t be hard to wax lyrical for a dissertation’s length about the sheer brilliance of this album. There’s not a dull note or word out of place, and the only annoying thing about it is how consistently perfect Annie Clark manages to be (she’s far too sweet to tread on even the tiniest nerve), but to detail them all would deprive you of the pleasures of discovering them yourself. She’s not nearly hubristic enough for this lyric to be intentionally self-referential, but when on ‘Save Me From What I Want’ she sings, “the future’s got big plans for me”, you can only hope that’s an understatement. Flawless.
100%

St. Vincent on MySpace

38 Responses to St. Vincent – Actor

  1. Kate Garchinsky (katesnowbird) May 6, 2009 at 8:24 am #

    Lovely review!

  2. Rich Hughes May 6, 2009 at 8:47 am #

    Yeah – i’ve really fallen for this album. The debut was good, but didn’t click with me. This clicked from the very first time I pressed play. Great stuff.

  3. Anika May 6, 2009 at 8:58 am #

    Strangely, when I first heard Marry Me I disregarded it, then came back to it a few months later and loved it. I loved this one instantly though.

  4. snapes May 6, 2009 at 9:03 am #

    I had the same thing with Marry Me – I heard it playing the one time I went to Rough Trade, and bought it instantly, but it didn’t capture me that much afterwards. Considering how much I love Actor, I’m going to revisit Marry Me asap.

    Also, another thought – if Marry Me was named after Arrested Development, d’you reckon Actor could be a sly nod to Tobias?! “I’m an actor Michael!”

  5. Adam May 6, 2009 at 9:28 am #

    Ace review for an ace album!

  6. Anika May 6, 2009 at 10:36 am #

    Hahaha. You are completely right, it MUST be a Tobias reference. I think she should name the next one Monster in honour of Buster.

  7. snapes May 6, 2009 at 10:51 am #

    I can totally imagine Lindsay singing ‘Actor Out of Work’ to Tobias :)

  8. Anika May 6, 2009 at 10:58 am #

    I think Lucille would do it better.

  9. ro May 6, 2009 at 11:22 am #

    oh for gods sake can we stop having 100% scores already.
    This has happened before and it was ridiculous before.
    I’m happy to believe this is a great record. But will it be a legendary record, a timeless classic? Is it, in fact, the best record ever made?
    perhaps TLOBF should switch to grade points or stars or something.

  10. Simon Gurney May 6, 2009 at 11:56 am #

    Nothing wrong with enthusiasm and being a bit ridiculous, Ro.

    I liked the review a lot, it’s got me streaming the album when I had intended to not give it a go at all.

  11. ro May 6, 2009 at 12:18 pm #

    i like the review i just don’t like the idea of a ‘perfect score’

  12. ama May 6, 2009 at 12:35 pm #

    douche chill…

  13. ro May 6, 2009 at 12:41 pm #

    excuse me?

  14. snapes May 6, 2009 at 1:35 pm #

    It’s the most perfect album I’ve heard in at least the past five years (it certainly blows away all competition from 2009), so I think it deserves 100%. It’s impossible to fault, its joyful and intelligent – what part of that doesn’t deserve full marks?

  15. ro May 6, 2009 at 2:21 pm #

    look, I just happen to feel that a mark of 100% denotes absolute perfection. Im happy to believe it’s close to perfect, but this would suggest that it is the best record ever made. Which, I suspect, it is not. The fact that you say its the most perfect album youve heard in at least the last 5 years suggests that you may have heard more ‘perfect’ albums.

    Still I can’t be bothered to argue any more.

  16. Matt Poacher May 6, 2009 at 2:25 pm #

    I’m with Ro – great review and all but 100% is bonkers to give to any record, let alone one that’s only been out a matter of weeks. I think you need to live with something for a good few years before it can be properly digested. What about critical distance and all that?

  17. Rich Thane May 6, 2009 at 3:00 pm #

    it’s just a score. chill out dudes. it’s the words that count. innit. x

  18. Rich Thane May 6, 2009 at 3:06 pm #

    but SRLYS

    it IS just a score – me and rich have always given our writers full freedom to score an album whatever way they feel fit – so moaning about it is pointless.

    yes – we have occasionally changed a score, if we strongly believe that the words don’t quite match the numbers. but on the rare occasion that a record gets 100% the review REAAAAAAALLY has to warrant it. and in this case it does.

    so there is no point in arguing about it. it is what it is.

    if you think that the scores here are pointless, then me and rich will simply start scoring the albums ourselves.

  19. ro May 6, 2009 at 3:12 pm #

    rich- who says the scores are pointless? if we thought that we wouldn’t be having the conversation…:)

  20. snapes May 6, 2009 at 3:20 pm #

    “The fact that you say its the most perfect album youve heard in at least the last 5 years suggests that you may have heard more ‘perfect’ albums.”

    I didn’t want to put that it’s the greatest album I’ve ever heard because I think I’m yet to hear that. After having listened to it about 50 times over the past few weeks, I’d firmly put it up there with my other favourite albums in terms of perfection, enjoyment and intelligence. I couldn’t justify taking any points off – if someone said, what did she do to make you deny her that last few percent, I’d have no answer.

    If you want a totally objective score on an album, pop over to Metacritic and take a look at their aggregated ratings. In the quick turn around of music journalism, you can’t expect critical distance (and after all, it’s the first few listens that’ll either turn someone onto or put someone off an album), and that’s an accusation that you can level at any rating of a record – how does a critic know that an album’s only worth 57%/91%/20% when they’ve only spent a few weeks with it at most?

    (By the way, I’m not getting at anyone, but this is an interesting debate on the nature of reviews, you’re all pleasantly distractingly me from my essay…)

  21. Rich Thane May 6, 2009 at 3:22 pm #

    i know man – but there is no point in getting worked up about something that the writer has free reign on. laura thinks this album is perfect – she gives it a 100%

    it’s EXACTLY the same as giving it 5 stars imo. well kinda.

    i have LOADS of 100% albums that i could list… that, to me, no one could ever criticise (loney dear, sologne being one of them)

    you see where i’m coming from?

    but like i said before – because it is such a drastic thing to give an album, the review reaaaaally has to justify it, which it does.

    anyway – debate is good. but lets actually talk about this album eh? it is PRETTY fucking great if you ask me.

  22. snapes May 6, 2009 at 3:26 pm #

    Good thinking Rich ;)

    So yeah, impressions so far? Favourite track? I’ve had to ban myself from listening to The Party for a few days, it’s like the Mona Lisa’s eyes following me – whatever mood I’m in, this song just gets me right THERE, y’know?

  23. ro May 6, 2009 at 3:48 pm #

    You see, I can’t think of an album that I would give 100% too rich, not a single one.
    I guess it’s because I can’t imagine having reached the zenith of my listening ability. I always hope that there is something I can hear that will be even better than my current favourite record.

    I would argue that 5 stars are not the same as 100% on the principle that 5 stars meerely denotes excellence where as 100% is perfection. Do you see. It’s hard to explain in typing with a head cold.

    I am now keen to hear this, although I didnt really get on with the previous one. I also have a sneaking suspicion, reading Laura’s website that my ears and her ears have different tastes…..:)

  24. Ash May 6, 2009 at 3:55 pm #

    It’s up to the writer. If Laura digs it, cool. I listened to the MySpace and thought “Meh”. Doesn’t matter – it’s just opinion. P4K chucks out 10s to re-releases and DiS hands out 10s to the same releases.
    Coinkidinky!

    I’ve given albums 5 outta 5 – but the 100% scale is like, well bigger bruv! So I disagree with you there, Mr Thane as 100 allows a greater breadth of score.

    Scores is scores – just a guide. If you like it, you’ll buy it. If ya don’t – ne’ermind.

    Right. Back to Gallows…

  25. Tom Whyman May 6, 2009 at 4:14 pm #

    As a big fan of extremes of scoring, I’m always willing to back someone giving 100%.

    Personally I’m not sure the words quite match the sentiment I think a 100% review should have, because I think that bug-eyed excitement should scream from every word to match the brilliance of the music. But that might just be my personal style, and from what I’ve heard it’s more of a crystalline record than that, you know…

    I like the idea that we should be allowed to give extreme scores. But, I’d be inclined to agree with Ro that grade points are better… for most records, but not for extremes! Because grading CAN’T reflect sentiment in such a direct way, its far more suited to the middle ground where the vagaries of giving a percentage score don’t matter. 90% + are where the little percentage points matter most. We should also be allowed to give a flat nothing. Everything else should be graded imo.

  26. Simon Gurney May 6, 2009 at 4:18 pm #

    I think the score at the end is only a very small part of a review, it’s the actual words that are important, just like Thane is saying. Also, does there have to be some ideal dream of the ‘perfect album’? Does looking at an album critically mean you have to be deadly serious about every aspect, all the time? Where’s the flexibility and individuality in that?

  27. Matt Poacher May 6, 2009 at 4:30 pm #

    Well look we’re all pretty passionate about music, and presumably about writing, so if something is given a 100% perfect review it’s bound to raise some debate – both about the record and the very fact of something being denoted as perfect. Which is what I thought the comments were for.

    I feel like a bully now. No offence, Laura.

  28. snapes May 6, 2009 at 5:52 pm #

    None taken Matt Poacher!

  29. ro May 6, 2009 at 6:21 pm #

    like wise. there is no offense meant. but as you say- we all care and have our opinions yaddah yaddah yaddah

  30. RIny May 6, 2009 at 6:48 pm #

    actor is a 100% natural good time solution.

  31. paulo May 7, 2009 at 8:13 am #

    It’s available on spotify, and I’ve listened a few times- but I haven’t even made up mind whether it’s even worth a purchase from emusic! so not a 100% for me.

    Hope the/a Dear Reader review will be up soon- give that album 100% please! :)

  32. ro May 7, 2009 at 4:26 pm #

    I’m afraid that having given this a run through i’m not that impressed. I don’t think it would even be in my top 5 records of the year. Sorry. I’m not really down with the vocals, which are a bit ‘bland’ at times. Or the production.
    But i’m glad you like it snapes. That’s your right!

  33. Walter May 8, 2009 at 6:49 am #

    wow, very clear review, i like it. st vincents new album is very classy, genuine and a keeper.also – actor out of work video is so boss.

  34. Anthony May 9, 2009 at 12:39 pm #

    Good album I think but not great. Best thing I’ve heard this year is Joe Gideon and the Shark I thinks and thats about a 89% I’d say!

  35. Lewis May 13, 2009 at 2:38 pm #

    Listened to this a couple of times now. It seems to be very good. It also seems, as others have said, to be not even close to being my favourite record of the year so far. It’s not transcendent. It’s exceptional genre-work, perhaps. I dunno.

  36. Ash May 14, 2009 at 11:42 pm #

    http://www.godisinthetvzine.co.uk/content/content_detail.php?id=3305&type=Singles

    I know it’s a single review – but it’s quite funny, really.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. St. Vincent announces summer UK & Ireland shows | The Line Of Best Fit - June 4, 2009

    [...] the release of sophomore album Actor (which received a rather controversial 100% score when reviewed on TLOBF), St. Vincent will return to the UK this summer for a spate of shows, [...]