The National – Royal Festival Hall, London 10/08/09

By ,

thenational-1
Photo credit: Crazybobbles

Sat to our right is a smartly dressed, well-to-do 50-something couple who look as though they might be more at home at the kind of Royal Festival Hall performance when the Queen would be occupying the regal box. However we’re proven wrong as conversation quickly turns to the band of the evening, who they adored last year at Shepherd’s Bush Empire and whose music provides the soundtrack to “our National evenings,” says the wife. “We know all the words, we sit for a night and listen to all their albums – it’s wonderful.” This is what I love about The National – that they inspire these kinds of quietly devoted fans of all ages who never tire of trying to untangle the inexhaustible mysteries of their lyrics (or who are quite happy to marvel at their fathoms-deep vagueness) and work out how their music gets you right there. This isn’t going to be any kind of objective review – The National are one of those scant bands for which I have next to no capacity for criticism and whose lyrics manage to retrospectively narrate and explain parts of my life better than I ever could. At least, that’s what I think they’re on about.

thenational-2

Following a perfect length set from Broken Records (who alongside The Leisure Society and The Twilight Sad form some kind of holy musical triumvirate and divine light which shows that the future of British music is in safe hands), they appear, supplemented by two trombone players and a keys/synths/violin virtuoso. The brothers Dessner look tiny in real life, especially against “the basement of my brain” black void of the stage. “This is a new song,” says Matt Berninger by way of introduction, and an instant hush spreads across the rows. I think it’s ‘Runaway’, as a bootleg from their 23/05 Boston show would have it. Matt’s at perhaps his calmest of the whole evening, crooning “I won’t be no runaway” as the brass glows in gradually, like the warm hand of a lover smoothing across your back.

thenational-3

They play a couple of other new songs that they don’t offer the names of before ‘Blood Buzz Ohio’ in the encore, which has a similar feel to ‘Daughters of the Soho Riots’. A few songs in and the military clatter of Bryan Devendorf’s drums in ‘Mistaken For Strangers’ feels like an artillery of arrows fired to prick the surface of our eyes – but despite the sobriety of the music and RFH’s grandeur, Matt in particular brims with exuberance – when not singing, he runs around the stage screaming what looks like “MAKE IT LOUDER!” at his band mates, then spars with the more riotous elements of the crowd, one of whom persists in yelling “tell everyone to stand up!” and eventually scores a sort of Pyrrhic victory when his voice becomes lost in the throng that gathers before the stage. He pours a glass of white wine and passes it to a chap in the crowd sometime before ‘Squalor Victoria’, which has him climbing amps to roar the titular lyrics at the pleasant folk in the balcony. He rails and stomps, contorted by the throat-ravaging dint of his own scream which stings and terrifies with base carnal anger and reproach, then leaps to the floor and runs up about 25 rows of steps, storming in amongst the seats. It feels like we’re witnessing some kind of ritual exorcism, though at least Matt’s playful demons remain when later on he beats a metal wine bucket on the floor repeatedly, spewing water and ice everywhere. After taking a tentative step, you can almost see the thought that this might end messily get dropkicked from his consideration by a gigantic “fuck it, I’m doing it anyway” – a running leap turns into a magnificent wipeout that ends at Aaron Dessner’s feet and pedals and has him laughing so hard it’s a wonder he keeps playing. But play on they do, into a far calmer encore that ever so slightly betrays the balance of the set. It’s a minor gripe though for a band this devastatingly spectacular. Until the release and touring of their next album in Spring 2010, here’s to National evenings and getting lost in their ever expanding shadows of meaning.

thenational-4

13 Responses to The National – Royal Festival Hall, London 10/08/09

  1. rhys August 13, 2009 at 12:37 pm #

    aye…the national were on fantastic form but im afraid im going to have to disagree with you on Broken Records- i thought their bombast felt flat and was very dissapointed as i had heard great things. I can only assume their record is called 'tweeon bible'

  2. bridgeta August 13, 2009 at 12:53 pm #

    Think I was the 50+ wife. You don't mention that we nearly got beaten up for telling the people in front of us to sit down – but when you're knocking on a bit like us, you just don't have the stamina anymore…I'd normally be tucked up in bed with a cup of cocoa.

    Great night though!

  3. shepproudfoot August 13, 2009 at 2:39 pm #

    great review. but i can only echo rhy's comment about broken records. the album is a pile of utter tripe.

  4. liveon35mm August 13, 2009 at 4:20 pm #

    I wasn't impressed by Broken Records either, mainly because The National performance blew any of their memory away

  5. paulo13 August 13, 2009 at 8:54 pm #

    pff to the Broken Records negativity. It's a top knotch album (but then, I also do love Neon Bible), and their live set was excellent too. Wish I could go up to Edinburgh this weekend to see them and My Latest Novel play at the same gig!

  6. sheilamoses August 14, 2009 at 10:35 am #

    To shepproudfoot and liveon35mm – shame on you that you find it so easy to attach yourself to success – i can guess that you are members of the sadly over-subscribed 'Waiting To See' society. If you'd seen The National 5 years ago – or just after they'd released their first album – you'd probably be saying the same things about them as you do now about Broken Records. Maybe you should change your blog names to Bitter and Twisted and Jealous because that is how your comments appear. Best Regards.

  7. shepproudfoot August 14, 2009 at 11:03 am #

    oh c'mon. broken records have hardly had mainstream success. that's just a lazy and expected response from ANY super-fan. twisted and jealous doesn't even come into it. we just DON'T like their music, it's really as simple as that.

  8. sheilamoses August 14, 2009 at 11:19 am #

    You've missed the point – when The National were at the stage Broken Records are at now, they hadn't had any mainstream success either – so it would appear your opinion is based on whether an act has had 'mainstream success' before you can tell whether they're any good or not. Well Done.

  9. liveon35mm August 14, 2009 at 12:32 pm #

    erm, when and where did I use the word mainstream?
    if there is someone supporting bands which are not (or not yet) mainstream that one is me.

    I just thought The National were far better than Broken Records (which were not that bad but clearly a couple of level below the intensity of the National performance) as simple as that.

  10. shepproudfoot August 14, 2009 at 5:49 pm #

    sheilamoses – i don't like Broken Records music.

    simple. as. that.

    why compare them to the national? why compare them to anybody? in my opinion, they just don't write very good songs. if they come back with a great second album then great! i'll give them another chance. but as it stands – their debut is one of the most disappointing releases of the year.

    it's just an opinion.

  11. paulo13 August 14, 2009 at 8:55 pm #

    How many times have you listened to the Broken Records album, Rich? Perhaps you'll change your mind one day (providing sheila stops her crazy ranting anyway…). Can't quite understand anyone liking MLN but not liking BR.

  12. shepproudfoot August 15, 2009 at 5:48 am #

    countless times, honestly. i was really excited about it – being a massive fan of my latest novel, arcade fire et al. but to me, it's just a my latest novel album without any songs. there is nothing that stands out on it for me at all… i just think that it's a real marmite record – there are folk who adore it, and folk who just don't get it at all..

    i'd still like to see them live. as long as sheilamoses wasn't there wielding a hacksaw with my name on it.

  13. shepproudfoot August 15, 2009 at 6:48 am #

    countless times, honestly. i was really excited about it – being a massive fan of my latest novel, arcade fire et al. but to me, it's just a my latest novel album without any songs. there is nothing that stands out on it for me at all… i just think that it's a real marmite record – there are folk who adore it, and folk who just don't get it at all..

    i'd still like to see them live. as long as sheilamoses wasn't there wielding a hacksaw with my name on it.